![]() Fourth, we must leave no voice or solution behind. ![]() Third, we need to raise ambition in mitigation, but also in adaptation and finance as the three big pillars of the climate change regime. We have been negotiating the operating guidelines for five years. Second, we need to wrap up negotiations on the Paris Agreement and fully implement it. This obligation is very important to build the trust necessary to emerge from the conference as an international community with the common goal of making the Paris Agreement a reality. Those must be honored and completed, especially the pledge by developed countries to mobilize $100 billion annually to support developing countries with climate change. The first relates to the promises that have been made in the past. What would success look like at the upcoming Glasgow Climate Conference, COP26? The climate emergency can only be solved with ambition, determination and political will. We need to accelerate and take radical, very courageous decisions. Governments are willing to build back better and invest in climate solutions while recovering from the pandemic.īut this is not yet enough. Electric cars are no longer a novelty product for car makers but central to their long-term plans. We’re seeing encouraging efforts in the expansion of renewable energy. Yet we need to recognize some positive signs. It is difficult to talk about advancements if we look at the figures on emissions. How are they going to get to those net zero goals? We’re still having a problem in seeing those commitments reflected in immediate plans, however, like the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement. We have seen recently an increase in the number of governments, cities, companies and investors committing to mid-century net-zero emissions goals. 2050 is important, but by 2030, we need a 45 per cent reduction in emissions. Yes, but we must not go into a situation where governments or businesses or any other organization commits to net zero by 2050 and then thinks okay, I have 30 years to go. Is committing to net-zero emissions by 2050 an important framework to mobilize action? ![]() We have only 10 years to go for deep transformations. Science is telling us that reduction needs to be 45 per cent. The data take us to less than a 1 per cent reduction in emissions by 2030. But the recent report on the Nationally Determine Contributions released just a few weeks ago shows that we are nowhere near the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5 degrees by the end of the century. We do have the Paris Agreement, which gives us guidance on how to get out of this emergency. Unfortunately, we are in a climate emergency. Where are we on climate action right now?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |